<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sex Ed Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sexedcentral.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sexedcentral.com</link>
	<description>Real Sexuality Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s official &#8211; we&#8217;ve grown! by Jocelyne</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/its-official-weve-grown/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2384#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody! I am so excited and honoured to be a guest writer on Candice&#039;s fantastic blog! 
I will be uploading a bio soon so you all can get to know me a bit better. I already have some interesting posts in the works and I&#039;m hoping to bring fresh eyes and a queer focus to Sex Ed Central.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody! I am so excited and honoured to be a guest writer on Candice&#8217;s fantastic blog!<br />
I will be uploading a bio soon so you all can get to know me a bit better. I already have some interesting posts in the works and I&#8217;m hoping to bring fresh eyes and a queer focus to Sex Ed Central.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catholic Students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances &#8230; by The Catholic School Board vs GSAs - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/catholic-students-are-fighting-for-gay-straight-alliances/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>The Catholic School Board vs GSAs - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=1377#comment-761</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, if you&#039;ve been reading my blog for a while, you might recall me writing about this in June of last year: &quot;Catholic students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, if you&#8217;ve been reading my blog for a while, you might recall me writing about this in June of last year: &#8220;Catholic students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monogamish Week! by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/monogamish-week/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2312#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mean to throw the ball back at you, but what you wrote triggered a though.

It&#039;s that I find particularly interesting the view that, in the event of one partner being caught cheating in a monogamous relationship, that the result should automatically be a split.

There is such an importance put on monogamy that we are willing to throw away everything if it is not respected. There are without a doubt times when this is the right course of action. However it happens so often that you have to wonder why people don&#039;t just start off with the assumption that it might occur, or at least that the thought or desire of getting involved with others during the course of a very long term relationship will eventually be felt, if not acted on.

The point is, why not be proactive about it and have an intelligent discussion considering ways to deal with it, either when it will happen, or before it happens. A non-monogamous or open relationship is kind of an umbrella term that encompasses really everything other than monogamy. It&#039;s too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that if you&#039;re not monogamous, then you&#039;re up for grabs and you&#039;re just careless and promiscuous. There are a lot of variations possible between the two extremes.

I like to think of it as being a relationship designer. We spend so much time personalizing our clothes and our hair and our homes and everything that surrounds us. Maybe we should consider that we can also design our relationship. Forgeting the monogamy vs non-monogamy terms, which may be too polarized for many people, I think it&#039;s accessible to everyone to just ask themselves, if I could design the perfect, bullet-proof relationship for me, what would that be?

The interest I have in Dan publishing the letters he&#039;s received, is to demonstrate the breath of arrangements that are possible, and to realize we can apply our imagination and our creativity to the problem of how to make our relationships more successful.

You can have your blog back now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to throw the ball back at you, but what you wrote triggered a though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that I find particularly interesting the view that, in the event of one partner being caught cheating in a monogamous relationship, that the result should automatically be a split.</p>
<p>There is such an importance put on monogamy that we are willing to throw away everything if it is not respected. There are without a doubt times when this is the right course of action. However it happens so often that you have to wonder why people don&#8217;t just start off with the assumption that it might occur, or at least that the thought or desire of getting involved with others during the course of a very long term relationship will eventually be felt, if not acted on.</p>
<p>The point is, why not be proactive about it and have an intelligent discussion considering ways to deal with it, either when it will happen, or before it happens. A non-monogamous or open relationship is kind of an umbrella term that encompasses really everything other than monogamy. It&#8217;s too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that if you&#8217;re not monogamous, then you&#8217;re up for grabs and you&#8217;re just careless and promiscuous. There are a lot of variations possible between the two extremes.</p>
<p>I like to think of it as being a relationship designer. We spend so much time personalizing our clothes and our hair and our homes and everything that surrounds us. Maybe we should consider that we can also design our relationship. Forgeting the monogamy vs non-monogamy terms, which may be too polarized for many people, I think it&#8217;s accessible to everyone to just ask themselves, if I could design the perfect, bullet-proof relationship for me, what would that be?</p>
<p>The interest I have in Dan publishing the letters he&#8217;s received, is to demonstrate the breath of arrangements that are possible, and to realize we can apply our imagination and our creativity to the problem of how to make our relationships more successful.</p>
<p>You can have your blog back now. <img src='http://sexedcentral.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Savage Says &#8211; The Monogamish Closet by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/savage-says-the-monogamish-closet/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2227#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Her discourse reminds me of an interview I heard with Adam Phillips, the author of &lt;i&gt;Monogamy&lt;/i&gt;, where he was expressing the wish that people in general were more receptive or more willing to have this discussion about what kind of relationship would make them most happy, whether it&#039;d be monogamy or non-monogamy. Not because monogamy is bad, but rather because we could all benefit from making an intelligent and informed choice about this most important aspect of our life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her discourse reminds me of an interview I heard with Adam Phillips, the author of <i>Monogamy</i>, where he was expressing the wish that people in general were more receptive or more willing to have this discussion about what kind of relationship would make them most happy, whether it&#8217;d be monogamy or non-monogamy. Not because monogamy is bad, but rather because we could all benefit from making an intelligent and informed choice about this most important aspect of our life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m still here &#8230; by Craig</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/im-still-here/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2179#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the new gig, Candice!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the new gig, Candice!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Ontario Proposed Curriculum: Human Development and Sexual Health Excerpts by A Never-Ending Battle: Religion vs Sexual Orientation - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/education-central/sexuality-education/2010-ontario-proposed-curriculum-human-development-and-sexual-health-excerpts/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>A Never-Ending Battle: Religion vs Sexual Orientation - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?page_id=2036#comment-730</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010 Ontario Proposed Curriculum: Human Development and Sexual Health Excerpts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010 Ontario Proposed Curriculum: Human Development and Sexual Health Excerpts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sex Education For Parents by Hey parents, it's time to get talking to your kids - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/education-central/sexuality-education/sex-education-for-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey parents, it's time to get talking to your kids - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>[...] Sex Education For Parents [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sex Education For Parents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If being gay is a choice by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/if-being-gay-is-a-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2116#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Now that would be a sight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that would be a sight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sex Ed Central gets a radio plug! by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/sex-ed-central-gets-a-radio-plug/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2103#comment-671</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great! Good for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great! Good for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sexual Satisfaction + Marriage + The Pill = ??? by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/sexual-satisfaction-marriage-the-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2074#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Interesting! Some of it makes sense intuitively. But the idea that women on the pill are less sexually satisfied but are more likely to stay with their partner is a direct refute to the old belief that girls on the pill were more likely to have promiscuous behaviors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! Some of it makes sense intuitively. But the idea that women on the pill are less sexually satisfied but are more likely to stay with their partner is a direct refute to the old belief that girls on the pill were more likely to have promiscuous behaviors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: sexedcentral.com @ 2012-02-22 18:49:03 -->
