<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sex Ed Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sexedcentral.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sexedcentral.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are you HIV-IGNORANT? by Candice</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/are-you-hiv-ignorant/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2236#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Yes you may. I&#039;ve sent you an email with more details. Looking forward to hearing from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you may. I&#8217;ve sent you an email with more details. Looking forward to hearing from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are you HIV-IGNORANT? by Joline Melanson</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/are-you-hiv-ignorant/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Joline Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2236#comment-807</guid>
		<description>May I use this in our blog please?  Our blog is AIDS NB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I use this in our blog please?  Our blog is AIDS NB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Savage Says: Another Gold-Star Pedophile by Candice</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/savage-says-another-gold-star-pedophile/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2577#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Jocelyne. It is definitely an interesting perspective and I&#039;m glad that I have been challenged to think about things differently. You hit it right on when you pointed out how quickly we judge others, and I think that this is especially the case when it comes to sexuality. One only needs to look at how we treat those whose sexuality differs from our opinion of &quot;what&#039;s right&quot; - such as what&#039;s happening in the US political arena right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Jocelyne. It is definitely an interesting perspective and I&#8217;m glad that I have been challenged to think about things differently. You hit it right on when you pointed out how quickly we judge others, and I think that this is especially the case when it comes to sexuality. One only needs to look at how we treat those whose sexuality differs from our opinion of &#8220;what&#8217;s right&#8221; &#8211; such as what&#8217;s happening in the US political arena right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Savage Says: Another Gold-Star Pedophile by Jocelyne</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/savage-says-another-gold-star-pedophile/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2577#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is such an interesting take on fetishes and sexual attraction. I think that as humans we&#039;re so quick to judge, especially with something as sensitive as pedophilia or sexual abuse. But as they say, there are always three sides to every story. 
Awesome post Candice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is such an interesting take on fetishes and sexual attraction. I think that as humans we&#8217;re so quick to judge, especially with something as sensitive as pedophilia or sexual abuse. But as they say, there are always three sides to every story.<br />
Awesome post Candice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Condoms and bedsheets by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/condoms-and-bedsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2454#comment-775</guid>
		<description>To be sure, I don&#039;t mind seeing condoms in porn, but I still think the legislation doesn&#039;t make sense when you think about it in terms of the greater context.

Why are we so shocked that there are porn actors who contract STDs? Everybody does. What we should be asking ourselves is how their rate of infection compares to that of the general population. Considering the amount of sex porn actors are having, it seems to me that they get infected much less than the normal population. Is there scientific data available about this?

Another thing I&#039;m thinking is that on television, the popularity of crime-based dramas is reaching never seen before heights. There is also an ever increasing emphasis on portraying violent and deadly acts as explicitly as possible. The same thing in movies. Yet, are we lobbying for that to stop because it shows &quot;unsafe behaviors&quot;? And to be sure, these dramas are shown during primetime, every night, and they are advertised and glorified. The exposure that porn has in comparison doesn&#039;t even come close.

The point is that what&#039;s needed is more education. People need to be educated that not everything in porn is meant to be real. Some is, some isn&#039;t, just like there are reality shows and documentaries on TV and there are also fiction and drama shows. Teaching young people that most women don&#039;t actually like their face covered in cum shouldn&#039;t be much harder than teaching them that most people don&#039;t think walking around with a gun is a good idea.

Instead of always making porn be the bad guy, it&#039;s time we start recognizing that a lot of healthy folks do watch porn as a normal part of their sex life. Instead of pushing porn to the dark alleys of our life and make people feel bad for watching it, we should embrace it and see it for what it is: a way to entertain your sexual self and get off. It&#039;s time we fully legalize it and allow ourselves to use it. Only then can education about it occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be sure, I don&#8217;t mind seeing condoms in porn, but I still think the legislation doesn&#8217;t make sense when you think about it in terms of the greater context.</p>
<p>Why are we so shocked that there are porn actors who contract STDs? Everybody does. What we should be asking ourselves is how their rate of infection compares to that of the general population. Considering the amount of sex porn actors are having, it seems to me that they get infected much less than the normal population. Is there scientific data available about this?</p>
<p>Another thing I&#8217;m thinking is that on television, the popularity of crime-based dramas is reaching never seen before heights. There is also an ever increasing emphasis on portraying violent and deadly acts as explicitly as possible. The same thing in movies. Yet, are we lobbying for that to stop because it shows &#8220;unsafe behaviors&#8221;? And to be sure, these dramas are shown during primetime, every night, and they are advertised and glorified. The exposure that porn has in comparison doesn&#8217;t even come close.</p>
<p>The point is that what&#8217;s needed is more education. People need to be educated that not everything in porn is meant to be real. Some is, some isn&#8217;t, just like there are reality shows and documentaries on TV and there are also fiction and drama shows. Teaching young people that most women don&#8217;t actually like their face covered in cum shouldn&#8217;t be much harder than teaching them that most people don&#8217;t think walking around with a gun is a good idea.</p>
<p>Instead of always making porn be the bad guy, it&#8217;s time we start recognizing that a lot of healthy folks do watch porn as a normal part of their sex life. Instead of pushing porn to the dark alleys of our life and make people feel bad for watching it, we should embrace it and see it for what it is: a way to entertain your sexual self and get off. It&#8217;s time we fully legalize it and allow ourselves to use it. Only then can education about it occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s official &#8211; we&#8217;ve grown! by chelsey</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/its-official-weve-grown/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>chelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2384#comment-774</guid>
		<description>so awesome. You&#039;re doing great, candice. :). Can&#039;t wait for the new perspective!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so awesome. You&#8217;re doing great, candice. <img src='http://sexedcentral.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Can&#8217;t wait for the new perspective!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s official &#8211; we&#8217;ve grown! by Jocelyne</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/its-official-weve-grown/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jocelyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2384#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody! I am so excited and honoured to be a guest writer on Candice&#039;s fantastic blog! 
I will be uploading a bio soon so you all can get to know me a bit better. I already have some interesting posts in the works and I&#039;m hoping to bring fresh eyes and a queer focus to Sex Ed Central.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody! I am so excited and honoured to be a guest writer on Candice&#8217;s fantastic blog!<br />
I will be uploading a bio soon so you all can get to know me a bit better. I already have some interesting posts in the works and I&#8217;m hoping to bring fresh eyes and a queer focus to Sex Ed Central.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catholic Students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances &#8230; by The Catholic School Board vs GSAs - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/catholic-students-are-fighting-for-gay-straight-alliances/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>The Catholic School Board vs GSAs - Sex Ed Central &#124; Sex Ed Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=1377#comment-761</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, if you&#039;ve been reading my blog for a while, you might recall me writing about this in June of last year: &quot;Catholic students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, if you&#8217;ve been reading my blog for a while, you might recall me writing about this in June of last year: &#8220;Catholic students are fighting for Gay-Straight Alliances&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monogamish Week! by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/monogamish-week/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2312#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mean to throw the ball back at you, but what you wrote triggered a though.

It&#039;s that I find particularly interesting the view that, in the event of one partner being caught cheating in a monogamous relationship, that the result should automatically be a split.

There is such an importance put on monogamy that we are willing to throw away everything if it is not respected. There are without a doubt times when this is the right course of action. However it happens so often that you have to wonder why people don&#039;t just start off with the assumption that it might occur, or at least that the thought or desire of getting involved with others during the course of a very long term relationship will eventually be felt, if not acted on.

The point is, why not be proactive about it and have an intelligent discussion considering ways to deal with it, either when it will happen, or before it happens. A non-monogamous or open relationship is kind of an umbrella term that encompasses really everything other than monogamy. It&#039;s too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that if you&#039;re not monogamous, then you&#039;re up for grabs and you&#039;re just careless and promiscuous. There are a lot of variations possible between the two extremes.

I like to think of it as being a relationship designer. We spend so much time personalizing our clothes and our hair and our homes and everything that surrounds us. Maybe we should consider that we can also design our relationship. Forgeting the monogamy vs non-monogamy terms, which may be too polarized for many people, I think it&#039;s accessible to everyone to just ask themselves, if I could design the perfect, bullet-proof relationship for me, what would that be?

The interest I have in Dan publishing the letters he&#039;s received, is to demonstrate the breath of arrangements that are possible, and to realize we can apply our imagination and our creativity to the problem of how to make our relationships more successful.

You can have your blog back now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to throw the ball back at you, but what you wrote triggered a though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that I find particularly interesting the view that, in the event of one partner being caught cheating in a monogamous relationship, that the result should automatically be a split.</p>
<p>There is such an importance put on monogamy that we are willing to throw away everything if it is not respected. There are without a doubt times when this is the right course of action. However it happens so often that you have to wonder why people don&#8217;t just start off with the assumption that it might occur, or at least that the thought or desire of getting involved with others during the course of a very long term relationship will eventually be felt, if not acted on.</p>
<p>The point is, why not be proactive about it and have an intelligent discussion considering ways to deal with it, either when it will happen, or before it happens. A non-monogamous or open relationship is kind of an umbrella term that encompasses really everything other than monogamy. It&#8217;s too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that if you&#8217;re not monogamous, then you&#8217;re up for grabs and you&#8217;re just careless and promiscuous. There are a lot of variations possible between the two extremes.</p>
<p>I like to think of it as being a relationship designer. We spend so much time personalizing our clothes and our hair and our homes and everything that surrounds us. Maybe we should consider that we can also design our relationship. Forgeting the monogamy vs non-monogamy terms, which may be too polarized for many people, I think it&#8217;s accessible to everyone to just ask themselves, if I could design the perfect, bullet-proof relationship for me, what would that be?</p>
<p>The interest I have in Dan publishing the letters he&#8217;s received, is to demonstrate the breath of arrangements that are possible, and to realize we can apply our imagination and our creativity to the problem of how to make our relationships more successful.</p>
<p>You can have your blog back now. <img src='http://sexedcentral.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Savage Says &#8211; The Monogamish Closet by Fruit Taster</title>
		<link>http://sexedcentral.com/savage-says-the-monogamish-closet/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruit Taster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sexedcentral.com/?p=2227#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Her discourse reminds me of an interview I heard with Adam Phillips, the author of &lt;i&gt;Monogamy&lt;/i&gt;, where he was expressing the wish that people in general were more receptive or more willing to have this discussion about what kind of relationship would make them most happy, whether it&#039;d be monogamy or non-monogamy. Not because monogamy is bad, but rather because we could all benefit from making an intelligent and informed choice about this most important aspect of our life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her discourse reminds me of an interview I heard with Adam Phillips, the author of <i>Monogamy</i>, where he was expressing the wish that people in general were more receptive or more willing to have this discussion about what kind of relationship would make them most happy, whether it&#8217;d be monogamy or non-monogamy. Not because monogamy is bad, but rather because we could all benefit from making an intelligent and informed choice about this most important aspect of our life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/54 queries in 1.736 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 979/987 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sexedcentral.com @ 2012-04-25 09:55:45 -->
